Proposal Preparation

The documents and details for each proposal are often unique to the funding call and agency.  Below we provide tools and information to assist in proposal preparation.  Your grant coordinator will also provide you with detailed, project-specific consultation materials (upon completion of the QuickStart survey) that can be used to facilitate your proposal preparation. If you still have questions, reach out to your grant coordinator.

Pre-Proposal

Navigating the requirements for pre-proposals, letters of intent, and white papers can be tricky, but ensuring compliance from the start saves time later. This guide clarifies exactly when your pre-application materials must be routed through the Office of Research versus when you can submit them directly to the sponsor.

Limited Submission

Limited Submission is a funding program for which the sponsor has restricted the number of applications or proposals an institution can submit in response to that program. 

The principal investigator is responsible for notifying Research Services as soon as possible if a proposal is being developed for any program that limits the number of submissions from the institution.

The submission of more proposals than allowed may result in a disqualification of all proposals, so limited submissions are coordinated through Research Services.  Generally, all campuses are considered a single institution by sponsors (e.g. NSF) unless alternate limitations (“by school,” “by department”) clearly apply.  However, some sponsors may consider branch campuses as separate, by definition.  It is best to consult early with your Grant Coordinator to make a determination.

It is critical that the PI review the limited submission procedure decision tree PRIOR to completing a limited submission packet for internal review.

If it has been determined that institutional interest will exceed the sponsor cap, then the principal investigator should complete all Limited Submission Competition Materials (below) and submit the information to the Director of Research Services per the internally set deadline (at least 2 months prior to the sponsor deadline).  A cross-institutional committee (e.g. Research Associate Deans) will be convened by Research Services to determine which proposal(s) will be approved for submission to the sponsor; the committee will be chaired by a representative from the Office of Research (or a designee). All applicants will be informed by the Director of Research Services of the committee’s decision as expeditiously as possible and successful applicants should develop full proposals for submission utilizing normal procedures.

Previously authorized applicants are not automatically authorized to resubmit if an award was not secured from a past submission. Non-awarded PIs must go through the internal review and selection process as if it were a new submission. Within the 2-page preproposal outline, potential resubmissions should summarize reviewers’ concerns and how those concerns would be addressed in a resubmitted proposal.

Email materials to the Research Services Director as a single pdf document by the internal deadline.

  • Limited Submission Coversheet
  • Brief nomination Letter from Department Chair or equivalent – maximum 1 page
  • Brief pre-proposal outlining proposed research program – maximum 2 pages
  • NSF-formatted biosketch for the PI – maximum 2 pages
  • Resources/facilities statement, including any anticipated internal commitments (e.g. staff, facilities, cost share) – maximum 1 page
  • A copy of prior reviews in the case of a proposal resubmission

Budget Preparation

Effective budgeting is a critical part of developing and managing sponsored projects at Georgia Southern University. A well-prepared budget ensures compliance with sponsor and federal guidelines while capturing the full scope of resources needed to carry out research, instruction, and service activities.

The Office of Research provides faculty and staff with detailed guidance on every aspect of proposal budgeting—from salaries and fringe benefits to cost sharing, equipment, and travel. Use the topics in the sidebar to explore requirements and best practices for preparing and managing project budgets.

Compliance

Research Integrity helps researchers meet compliance requirements. 

All researchers are required to complete Responsible Conduct of Research Training and have a current Financial Conflict of Interest disclosure and training.

Additional areas of compliance consideration that may apply to your project include:

Supporting Documents

BioSketches and Current & Pending Support

SciENcv supports generation of NSF and NIH BioSketches and NSF Current & Pending Support documents as a means to reduce administrative burden.  PIs can input information once and then generate agency-specific documents.  A brief SciENcv tutorial is available.

Letters

Sometimes sponsors will request and/or require supporting letters.  The PI should verify all required/allowed letter types.  Violation of supporting letter policies can lead to proposals being returned without review.  For example, NSF has two unique types of letters: (1) Letters of Collaboration are templated letters that simply confirm willingness to participate and (2) Letters of Support that are only accepted if indicated in the solicitation.  An NSF Letter of Collaboration template is available to assist PIs.

If an institutional letter is requested/required as part of a proposal, the grant coordinator will secure signatures from the Vice Provost for Research or Provost.  If the letter is from the departmental or college level, then the PI will secure the signature.

Data Management Plan

Many sponsors require inclusion of a separate data management and dissemination plan and/or inclusion in the project description. The Georgia Southern Libraries offer numerous data management services, resources and professional development opportunities.

At this time, Georgia Southern IT systems cannot support any work that requires a NIST SP 800-171 Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC).  This restriction primarily affects federal contracts, awards, subcontracts and subawards.  Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if you think that your work may be impacted.  Specifically, GS cannot administer any agreement containing a DFARS 252.204-7000 clause.  A subcontract containing a DFARS 252.204-7012 clause can only be accepted if GS will not receive any covered defense information or controlled unclassified information, as guaranteed in writing by the contractor.

Internal Approvals

The PI should move forward to internal approval as early as possible.  Internal approval can be initiated after the PI has the following items: (1) grant coordinator-reviewed budget and aligned budget justification, (2) project summary, and (3) signed Institutional Commitment Form (if any institutional commitments).  The grant coordinator will upload all of these documents to the electronic grant file in preparation for internal approval routing.

The grant coordinator will send two templated emails associated with this process.  Before initiating approval routing, the grant coordinator will send the PI an approval initiation Email.  An affirmative PI response allows the internal approval process to move forward.  After approvals (aside from final administrative review of the full proposal package) are completed, the grant coordinator sends the PI an approval notification email. 

Early approval will allow the PI dedicated time to work on the project description and other project components.  If budgetary changes arise after approval, reach out to your grant coordinator for assistance.  It is likely that minor revisions can be accommodated, but major revisions may require a new internal approval process.

University Information

Institutional Facts for Proposal Development

Proposals are submitted through the Georgia Southern University Research and Service Foundation. Use this guide for pertinent information relating to the foundation and proposal submission is provided (e.g. name, address, Authorized Organizational Representative, Congressional District).

Resource Information

Institutional data and standard resource descriptions are included below that may aid in proposal development.

University Fact Book
  • The University Fact Book provides data on our students, faculty, staff, and services that may be helpful when developing a proposal.
University Standard Language

The University has developed standard and boilerplate language to describe institutional resources that may aid proposal development.

Editing Service

Editing services are available for PIs to correct for language usage, grammar, etc.  However, these are contract services that require significant lead time.  If you may be interested, please discuss with your grant coordinator early in the process to determine feasibility.

Frequently Asked Questions

Need some help? If the list of frequently asked questions below does not answer your question, our team of expert grant coordinators is standing by to assist you.

Contact Research Services

The budget and budget justification present a financial picture of your project to the reviewer and helps the reviewer understand your project.  It can also help you more accurately determine the scope of your project.  Funding caps and indirect costs often result in more narrowly focused projects to meet smaller funding opportunities.  It is important that the scope of the project align with the needed support.

First, consider your project’s resource needs. Read the sponsor’s guidelines and note any limitations.  Use the online resources to generate a draft budget and budget justification.  Also, watch for professional development opportunities.  Finally, your grant coordinator can assist with specific questions, as needed.

Do I have to use the GS template and exemplar budget justification to develop my budget for the Internal Approval process?

No, you do not have to use the GS budget template.  You should use the template that makes the most sense for your final submission; however, the GS template has embedded calculations that will allow you to more accurately generate a draft budget.

The budget justification allows the PI to fully explain the need/alignment for specific expenditures within the scope of the project and demonstrate how total amounts were determined.  Transparent, well-aligned budgets and budget justifications indicate the ability to manage a project and are less likely to result in significant cuts at the award stage.  Note: The budget justification should align with the budget categories in the budget.

Budgeting for salary and benefits takes careful planning so that your account will not run out of funds. Because we do not know from year to year what the state will allocate for raises, your budget is really a “best estimate.” The university does not charge the grant account more than the actual salary and fringe benefits expenses.  The grant coordinator will provide you with needed base salary information and the GS Budget Template has embedded calculations for fringe benefits and annual estimated raises.

The university’s approved on-campus F&A rate (also known as Indirect Cost Rate) is 42% of a modified total direct cost basis.  Additional information on the F&A rate is available. The GS Budget Template will automatically calculate the F&A rate, excluding any appropriate categories.

F&A costs are charged to all sponsored programs (grants and contracts) under the requirements of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget and consistent with the University’s federally-negotiated rate determined by the Department of Health and Human Services.

If you believe that you will have a different F&A rate (e.g. funding opportunity limits F&A to less than 42%), then share that information with your grant coordinator as soon as possible so that appropriate approvals can be secured.  Obviously, the F&A rate will significantly impact your overall budget and the feasible scope of work, so you want to ensure that you are generating a draft budget using the correct percentage.

Know your current salary. If you are requesting a starting date for your project after the new fiscal year begins, you need to add some inflation to the current figure, probably a 1-3% raise (it is understood that this will be an estimate). A basic one course release for one semester is based on 10% of your academic year salary. Example: A $60,000 salary would mean that you would ask the funding agency for $6,000 in salary for a reduction of one course each semester.  This calculation is based solely on your base salary and does not include fringe benefits.

A simple way to calculate: If you plan to work one month on the project, use 11.11% of your academic salary.  Using $60,000 as a salary estimate, you would request $6,666 in summer salary; fringe benefits would also be added to the budget.  At a maximum, faculty on 9-month appointments can secure up to 33.33% of their academic year salary.  Remember that some funding agencies, notably the National Science Foundation, do not allow more than two summer months per year on a project. 

There are two methods to calculate fringe benefits: (1) see the Fringe Benefits section for rate tables and (2) use the GS Budget Template that has built-in calculations based on employee categories.

A funding agency will often require that the University contribute a specific percentage of the total project costs. For example, some agencies require a 1-to-1 match (if your total project sponsors budget is $50,000, the university will be asked to contribute $50,000 as a match).

Any matching arrangement requires prior institutional approval; see the Cost Sharing or Matching section.

Equipment is defined by the federal government and the university as tangible, nonexpendable property having a useful life of more than one year and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more per unit (including tax, shipping and installation). However, when the terms of an award set a lower dollar threshold for equipment – $1,000 for example – the PI’s department must track it as if it falls under the university’s definition of equipment.

Yes, there are some special considerations.

  • Equipment purchased on a sponsored project should be directly linked to the needs of the project.  General-purpose equipment is unallowable as a direct cost, except with the prior written approval of the sponsor.
  • If a piece of purchased equipment will benefit more than one sponsored agreement or activity, the cost should be distributed to all benefiting activities using a reasonable and documented method of allocation.
  • Maintenance and repair costs to keep project-specific equipment – whether existing or purchased with project funds – in operating condition may be allowable within the time frame of the project performance period.  If the maintenance agreement or repair cost benefits more than one sponsored agreement or activity, the cost must be allocated to the various projects and activities proportionately based on the benefit directly received by each.
  • Budgeted equipment is generally purchased in the beginning of a project unless the scope of work is such that the equipment is essential during a later period of performance. Note: If the equipment purchase is to be made within 60 days of the award end date, the justification must be reviewed and approved by Research Accounting before purchase.